Was stalin an effective leader. Joseph Stalin 2018-12-21

Was stalin an effective leader Rating: 6,3/10 856 reviews

Debate Argument: Stalin was an effective leader

was stalin an effective leader

Stalin's contributions definitely outweight those of the other Allies. Nevertheless he kept looking for chances to expand Communism beyond the Soviet frontiers, as he showed when he invaded Finland and the Baltic States in 1939- 40 and when the Soviets occupied Eastern Europe in the late 1940s. He gained considerable more power in 1924 at the death of Vladimir Lenin. If you declare the Soviet Union to be short-lived, you must also declare the United States to be short-lived. Stalin not only stopped the massive Nazi attack, but he also made a massive counter-attack and it was the Soviet Red Army that reached the German capital of Berlin, not the rest of the Allies. Losing the war in Vietnam and faced with socialist counterculture youth in their own home, imperialists had to withdraw and give equal rights to other races. Had Hitler sent those forces elsewhere, he could have defeated any enemy.

Next

Was Joseph Stalin an effective leader?

was stalin an effective leader

Free Essay, Term Paper and Book Report Joseph Stalin was a leader, which meant his people trusted him with their welfare; however, under Stalin’s rule, millions of the people who put their trust in him were killed. The difference between him and the rest of the Politburo in the 1920s was of a practical nature. This also helped Britain as the was no more Germany to fight! Poor German planning and the harsh winter is what allowed the Red Army enough time to fully mobilize and retaliate at Stalingrad. When the scope of Nazism changed to include communists, Hitler launched a surprise attack on Russia. However, on some level, he has to beadmired. And your second line there is incredibly misleading.

Next

Was Joseph Stalin an effective leader?

was stalin an effective leader

This phrase has many, sometimes contradictory, meanings. However, Lenin wanted Leon Trotsky to rule the Soviet Union. Could the Five Year Plans have been more successful? Had he not attacked Germany the allies mayhave lost. Even if my opponent does show how this was harmful to the entire nation, I highly doubt that this harm would be significant enough to counter all of the improvements that occurred under Stalin. Main idea and the one that makes the most sense is that the Nazis or the Americans made it up to make Stalin seem like a tyrant who only cared about himself and getting praised. The war ended before his troops could invade Japan.


Next

Debate Issue: Was Stalin a good leader?

was stalin an effective leader

. More about Stalin: Stalin was a brutal killer that surpassed even Hitler with peoplekilled. The infamous Holodomor caused the deaths of 6 to 8 million soviet citizens, most of which were Ukrainian 2. It is examples of that I am speaking of. It needs to be said that in August of 1939, Stalin and Hitlersigned the famous Russian-German Nom-Aggression Pact.

Next

Was Stalin a good leader

was stalin an effective leader

While Lenin was disabled from strokes, Joseph Stalin, Grigori Zinoviev and Lev Kamenev ran the country through the structure of the Communist Party. He helped industrialize Russia; before Hitler attacked. Of course Stalin's positive accomplishments will not outweigh his negative ones to many people. He is well loved by most Russians Most Americans wouldn't ever know how great a leader he was and led the Union to end World War 2 as one of two world superpowers. Increasingly it is asked whether this interpretation withstands scrutiny. He was a dictator who terrorized the population and sent many people to prisons and labour camps.

Next

Debate Argument: Stalin was an effective leader

was stalin an effective leader

I was talking about gulag workers - not the general populace. Arguments: I will now present my own arguments to show that Stalin managed to completely revolutionize the Soviet economy and military, making the nation a world superpower. Once Lenin had died, Stalin supposedly engaged in an attempt to prove that he was as least as great a revolutionary hero. He maintained his position by eliminating those whoopposed him politically. Once the Central Committee and Politburo records started to become accessible, this standpoint became widely accepted.

Next

Debate Issue: Was Stalin a good leader?

was stalin an effective leader

Karl Marx had died by the time of the revolution, so asidefrom planting the ideas of socialism, commu … nism and a revolt by thepeople in their minds, he had nothing to do with the revolutionitself. Tans lecture, Maastricht University: Laurence Rees on the The Charisma of Adolf Hitler, October 2012 Unwavering conviction In the 1920s, only a minority of Germans sympathised with Hitler, as became clear with his failed putsch in 1923 and his defeat in the elections of 1928, where he obtained only 2,6 percent of the votes. During the Great Patriotic War he wiped out Nazi party leadership at all levels, and Soviets defeated Hitler singlehandedly. A good place to start your research would be the first five year plan. Lenin was the leader and hero of the October Revolution of 1917,but had nothing to do with the February Revolution in 1917. Yet the truth is rather mixed. No Stalin was not a good leader to the Allies.

Next

Was Stalin a good leader

was stalin an effective leader

While Stalin could've been more careful in the process of collectivization, it seems that there seem to be no negative, long term effects and in the end, the agricultural revolution pays off. Stalin was not a Russian. I would very much like to debate this topic with you. Nazi war criminals and colaborators Stalin had mostly executed. The Soviet Union lasted 69 years as a sovereign entity and slightly longer as a movement. Was the Holodomor a justified price for the eventual success of collectivization? He also increased transportation be building many new railroads all across the country, including the Turkenstan-Siberian railway. I agree with my opponent's opening paragraph, we will not be arguing about his personal achievements, but rather how much he did for the nation.

Next

Stalin as War Leader

was stalin an effective leader

Stalin set out to destroy the kulaks, so the government confiscated these wealthy peasant’s land and sent them to l. But he also magnified these pre-existent sentiments. The violent removal of land owners led to further agricultural disruption, especially in Ukraine, the Soviet Republic with the most fertile land. They are as follows: 1909-1919; 1939-1949; 1969-1979; 1999-2019; 2039-2059; with 2 to follow at 20-year intervals, if enough people are left alive to endure it. He put accent on education and development, and soon masses of Soviet citizens rised from poverty and illiteracy to become the most educated nation on Earth. Even before the documentary revelations of the late 1980s under Mikhail Gorbachev, there was convincing evidence that the Bolshevik leaders agreed about fundamental aspects of the Soviet order more than they disagreed.

Next

Was Stalin an effective leader? by Charlotte Ellis on Prezi

was stalin an effective leader

I still think Stalin's disregard for democracy and the value of human life to be inexcusable. The World War was formally and openly declared in 1897, with the publication of a 5-vol. Stalin was first and foremost out for Stalin. During this period Stalin was arrested and had to go to prison many times. In the end, because I'm German, of course I wanted Hitler to win, but there's no denying Stalin and more so his generals like Zukhov and Khruschev pulled of an amazing accomplishment in repelling the Nazis in their last stand, and then going onto defeat them, and they also permanently cemented the idea that Russia cannot be completely invaded, as seen also in the Franco-Russo Napolean invasion. The Soviets possessed all of the advantages and still the Fins managed to bloody t … heir noses. The civil war has just ended in March of that year, and the country was still suffering.

Next